Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Andrade v. Chojnacki.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andrade v. Chojnacki Anchor | green | “it is with reference to the 'well-informed, thoughtful and objective observer, rather than the hypersensitive, cynical and suspicious person' that the objective standard is currently established.” | 5 |
| 2 | United States v. Baker | green | “amount to a grant of automatic veto power” | 3 |
| 3 | In re Damerau | green | “by its express terms, 144 applies only to proceedings 'in a district court' and is inapplicable to proceedings before a bankruptcy judge.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.