Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Liff v. Schildkrout.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Liff v. Schildkrout Anchor | green | “if a change should be made, it is for the legislature, and not the courts, to make” | 3 |
| 2 | Valicenti v. Valenze | green | “may consider both the evidence of the support decedent provided to the claimants before his death and evidence of the support the claimants could reasonably have expected but for his death” | 3 |
| 3 | Milbrandt v. A.P. Green Refractories Co. | green | “the court shall enter judgment in lump sum for past damages, for future damages not in excess of 250,000, and for any damages, fees or costs payable in lump sum or otherwise under subdivisions (c) and (d) of this section.” | 3 |
| 4 | Motelson v. Ford Motor Co. | green | “may be based upon the decedent's age, character, earning capacity, and life expectancy, and the circumstances of the distributees” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.