Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gaida-Newman v. Holtermann.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gaida-Newman v. Holtermann Anchor | green | “a plaintiff bears the ultimate burden of proof at trial on the issue of conscious pain and suffering, on a motion for summary judgment the defendant bears the initial burden of showing that the decedent did not endure conscious pain and suffering” | 3 |
| 2 | Johnson v. UniFirst Corp. | green | “in all but the most unusual circumstances, the adequacy of a warning is a question of fact' to be determined at trial” | 3 |
| 3 | Barbuto v. Winthrop University Hospital | green | “presented a credibility battle between the parties' experts, and issues of credibility” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.