Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Winiarski v. Harris.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Winiarski v. Harris Anchor | green | “there is a valid line of reasoning supporting the jury's verdict that defendant deviated from the applicable standard of care in his treatment of plaintiff's decedent . . . , and that such deviation was a proximate cause of the injuries” | 3 |
| 2 | Kenworth of Buffalo, NY, Inc. v. Hydroacoustics, Inc. | neutral | “the 'trial was a prototypical battle of the experts, and the jury's acceptance of plaintiff's case was a rational and fair interpretation of the evidence” | 3 |
| 3 | Sinclair v. Sandy Creek Central School District | neutral | “the standard for determining whether the jury's verdict is against the weight of the evidence is whether the evidence so preponderated in the aggrieved party's favor that the verdict could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence” | 3 |
| 4 | Pomeroy v. Buccina | green | “to establish proximate cause, a 'plaintiff must generally show that the defendant's negligence was a substantial cause of the events which produced the injury” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.