Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Johnson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Johnson Anchor | green | “because the court did not erroneously instruct the jury regarding justification, defense counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to that charge” | 6 |
| 2 | People v. Humphrey | green | “the justification charge, viewed in its entirety, was a correct statement of the law” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Hucks | green | “mere speculation that a jury may discern something sinister about a defendant's behavior does not render such behavior an uncharged crime” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.