Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cuttic v. Crozer-Chester Medical Center.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cuttic v. Crozer-Chester Medical Center Anchor | green | “when parties present to the district court a proposed settlement, the district court may enter a stipulated judgment if it determines that the compromise reached 'is a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over flsa provisions' rather than 'a mere waiver of statu…” | 5 |
| 2 | Kraus v. Pa Fit II, LLC | green | “in essence, for a bona fide dispute to exist, the dispute must fall within the contours of the flsa and there must be evidence of the defendant's intent to reject or actual rejection of that claim when it is presented.” | 4 |
| 3 | Cuttic v. Crozer-Chester Medical Center | green | “fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over flsa provisions rather than a mere waiver of statutory rights brought about by an employer's overreaching.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.