Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Anchor | green | “a word is presumed to have the same meaning in all subsections of the same statute.” | 4 |
| 2 | Prati v. United States | green | “sections 6501 and 6229 do not operate independently to allow a taxpayer to assert one in isolation and thereby render an otherwise timely assessment untimely.” | 3 |
| 3 | Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs | green | “we have often stated that a word is presumed to have the same meaning in all subsections of the same statute.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.