Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Corey Crugher v. John Prelesnik.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corey Crugher v. John Prelesnik Anchor | green | “may either attack the claim of jurisdiction on its face or it can attack the factual basis of jurisdiction.” | 6 |
| 2 | Bowers v. Wynne | green | “weigh the evidence and the plaintiff has the burden of proving that the court has jurisdiction over the subject matter.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.