Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Johnson v. Thompson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Johnson v. Thompson Anchor | green | “such a plaintiff must prove that he or she was discriminatorily denied medical treatment because of a medical condition and, at the same time, must prove that, in spite of the medical condition, he or she was 'otherwise qualified' to receive the denied medical treatment.” | 4 |
| 2 | Grant v. Alperovich | green | “assertion of discrimination in medical treatment decisions amounted to a claim of medical malpractice, rather than a claim of discrimination governed by the ada” | 4 |
| 3 | Kiman v. New Hampshire Department of Corrections | green | “however, courts have differentiated ada claims based on negligent medical care from those based on discriminatory medical care.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.