Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bruce A. Howell v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Eliot Savings Bank.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bruce A. Howell v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Eliot Savings Bank Anchor | green | “actual direct compensatory damages” | 5 |
| 2 | In the Matter of Las Colinas, Inc., Debtors. Appeal of Banco Popular De Puerto Rico. In the Matter of Las Colinas, Inc., Debtors | green | “conforms to the more general aim of awarding compensation in all cases, and it departs from the standard of value of performance only because of the difficulty in applying the latter standard.” | 3 |
| 3 | Bruce A. Howell v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Eliot Savings Bank | green | “actual direct compensatory damages,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.