Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Eagle Star Insurance Company, Ltd. v. Jo C. Deal.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eagle Star Insurance Company, Ltd. v. Jo C. Deal Anchor | green | “such guidelines suggest that economic reality and substance, rather than legalistic form, should be determinative of the word's meaning.” | 4 |
| 2 | Hancock v. Tri-State Insurance | green | “if some ambiguity creeps in, the interpreting court must first seek resolution within the wording of the instrument before resort to extraneous information is used.” | 4 |
| 3 | Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. Owen | green | “strictly interpret exclusions to insurance coverage and to resolve all reasonable doubts in favor of the insured who had no part in preparation of the contract.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.