Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Armstrong World Industries, Inc. v. Adams.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Armstrong World Industries, Inc. v. Adams Anchor | green | “there is a substantial controversy, between parties having adverse legal interests, of sufficient immediacy and reality.” | 6 |
| 2 | United States v. The Fisher-Otis Company, Inc., and Roy Fisher, Jr., Raymond H. Coit | green | “to settle actual controversies before they ripen into violations of a law or a breach of duty.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.