Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from American Express International Banking Corp. v. Sabet.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | American Express International Banking Corp. v. Sabet Anchor | green | “exercise ... sound judicial discretion with respect to whether reliance should be placed on the magistrate's findings.” | 6 |
| 2 | Alvaro L. Hernandez, Jr. v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections | green | “arrive at its own, independent conclusion about those portions of the magistrate's report to which objection is made.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.