Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Anchor | green | “language in a contract must be construed in the context of that instrument as a whole, and in the circumstances of that case, and cannot be found to be ambiguous in the abstract.” | 5 |
| 2 | Eucasia Schools Worldwide, Inc. v. DW August Co. | green | “the language of a contract is to govern its interpretation, if the language is clear and explicit, and does not involve an absurdity” | 3 |
| 3 | Munoz v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | green | “given the potential for recovery of significant civil penalties if the paga claims are successful, as well as attorney fees and costs, plaintiffs have ample financial incentive to pursue the remaining representative claims under the paga and, thereafter, pursue their appeal from…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.