Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Jesus Mendoza-Alvarez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Jesus Mendoza-Alvarez Anchor | green | “an 'otherwise unlawful use' under 2k2.1(b)(2) must be some action similar to an 'unlawful discharge,' such as using to gun to threaten or beat another person.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Benito Ramirez-Rios | green | “in determining whether 2k2.1(b)(2) applies, the focus of the inquiry is the 'intended lawful use” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.