Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Romero v. Dairyland Insurance.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Romero v. Dairyland Insurance Anchor | green | “embodies a public policy of new mexico to make uninsured motorist coverage a part of every automobile liability insurance policy issued in this state, with certain limited exceptions,” | 4 |
| 2 | Montano v. Allstate Indemnity Co. | green | “an insurance company should obtain written rejections of stacking in order to limit its liability based on an anti-stacking provision” | 4 |
| 3 | Montano v. Allstate Indemnity Co. | green | “it is unfair not to allow stacking when multiple premiums are paid or when the policy is otherwise ambiguous.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.