Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Robert Wilkerson v. Richard Stalder.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robert Wilkerson v. Richard Stalder Anchor | green | “the duration in segregated confinement that courts have found does not give rise to a liberty interest ranges up to two and one-half years.” | 6 |
| 2 | Jael Fraise v. Jack Terhune, Commissioner. Alexander Kettles v. James Barbo Howard Beyer. John Harris v. James Barbo Howard Beyer | green | “although inmates who are transferred to the stgmu security threat group management unit face additional restrictions, we hold that the transfer to the stgmu does not impose an atypical and significant hardship in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.