Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Department of Human Resources v. Phillips.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Department of Human Resources v. Phillips Anchor | green | “a litigant cannot submit to a ruling or acquiesce in the holding, and then complain of the same on appeal.” | 3 |
| 2 | Hovendick v. Presidential Financial Corp. | green | “when a pleader fails to set up a counterclaim through oversight, inadvertence, or excusable neglect, or when justice requires, he may by leave of court set up a counterclaim by amendment,” | 3 |
| 3 | Norman v. Ault | green | “a litigant cannot submit to a ruling or acquiesce in the holding, and then complain of the same on appeal.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.