Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bloomfield Estates Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. City of Birmingham.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bloomfield Estates Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. City of Birmingham Anchor | green | “a deed restriction represents a contract between the buyer and the seller of property.” | 7 |
| 2 | Denhardt v. De Roo | green | “where there is no express restriction in the chain of title of the particular lot the use of which is sought to be restricted, there must be proof of a 'scheme of restrictions' originating from a common owner.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.