Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Crocker.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Crocker Anchor | green | “obviously prejudiced in the sense that it was exposed to a 1 million judgment.” | 5 |
| 2 | Weaver v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. | green | “a more basic purpose is to advise the insurer that the insured has been served with process and that the insurer is expected to timely file an answer.” | 3 |
| 3 | Harwell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. | green | “it was harwell's duty to notify state farm of the suit against its insured when she received service of process; it was not state farm's duty to determine when or if harwell had been served.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.