Topic: the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidenc… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #3324

6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 95 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. West.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 State v. West Anchor
ariz · 2011
green “the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” 54
2 State v. Lee
ariz · 1997
green “when reasonable minds may differ on inferences drawn from the facts, the case must be submitted to the jury, and the trial judge has no discretion to enter a judgment of acquittal.” 15
3 State v. Pena
arizctapp · 2005
green “against the statutorily required elements of the offense,” 10
4 State v. West
ariz · 2011
green “whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” 8
5 State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew Payne
ariz · 2013
green “in reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we do not distinguish circumstantial from direct evidence.” 6
6 State v. Carrasco
arizctapp · 2001
green “a statute is unconstitutionally over broad when it prohibits or deters conduct protected by the first amendment.” 2

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check