Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from DeNina v. Bammel Forest Civic Club, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DeNina v. Bammel Forest Civic Club, Inc. Anchor | green | “restrictive covenants are to be strictly construed against those who seek to restrict the use of property, and all doubt must be resolved in favor of the free use of the property.” | 4 |
| 2 | Champlin Oil & Refining Company v. Chastain | green | “where there is a duty of finding out and knowing, negligent ignorance has the same effect in law as actual knowledge.” | 4 |
| 3 | In Re Egl Eagle Global Logistics, L.P. | green | “must do equity and come to court with clean hands” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.