Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board Anchor | green | “it is not our role to reweigh the evidence, redetermine the credibility of the witnesses, or resolve conflicts in the testimony, and we will not disturb the judgment if there is evidence to support it.” | 6 |
| 2 | People v. Superior Court (Jones) | green | “the circumstances and gravity of the offense alleged in the petition to have been committed by the minor.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.