Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Elahi v. Islamic Republic of Iran.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Elahi v. Islamic Republic of Iran Anchor | green | “accept as true the plaintiffs' uncontroverted evidence.” | 5 |
| 2 | Kaiser-Georgetown Community Health Plan, Inc. v. Stutsman | green | “the forum state's interest in the fair and efficient administration of justice' together with the 'substantial savings that can accrue to the state's judicial system' when its judges are 'able to apply law with which they are thoroughly familiar or can easily discover,' tilt the…” | 3 |
| 3 | Weinstein v. Islamic Republic of Iran | green | “actively encouraged, if not directed, the formation of hezbollah,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.