Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Davis v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Davis v. State Anchor | green | “purely technical discrepancies in dates or times do not automatically vitiate the validity of search or arrest warrants.” | 4 |
| 2 | Jones v. State | green | “a sworn affidavit . . . establishing probable cause shall be filed in every instance in which a search warrant is requested.” | 4 |
| 3 | Rougeau v. State | green | “the area of the motor vehicle designed for the seating of the operator and passengers of the vehicle.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.