Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Delta Mills, Inc. v. GMAC Commercial Finance LLC (In Re Delta Mills, Inc.).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Delta Mills, Inc. v. GMAC Commercial Finance LLC (In Re Delta Mills, Inc.) Anchor | green | “isolate and dispose of factually unsupported claims or defenses” | 4 |
| 2 | Delta Mills, Inc. v. GMAC Commercial Finance LLC (In Re Delta Mills, Inc.) | green | “when reasonable minds could disagree on the result.” | 4 |
| 3 | McANANEY v. ASTORIA FINANCIAL CORP. | green | “must do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.