Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Chesnut v. Progressive Casualty Insurance.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chesnut v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Anchor | green | “the basic test is one of fairness; the act need not rise to the level of fraud, negligence, or breach of contract.” | 4 |
| 2 | Ziegler v. Findlay Industries, Inc. | green | “a special relationship under which the defendant supplied information to the plaintiff for the latter's guidance in its business transaction.” | 3 |
| 3 | King v. Bogner | green | “recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress to instances where the plaintiff has either witnessed or experienced a dangerous accident or appreciated the actual physical peril” | 3 |
| 4 | Gawloski v. Miller Brewing Co. | green | “brewers and distributors of alcoholic beverages do not have a duty to warn consumers of the dangers inherent in the excessive or prolonged use of alcohol because those dangers are within the body of knowledge common to the community” | 1 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.