Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Lyons.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Lyons Anchor | green | “because the standard is reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause, a less rigorous showing in each of these areas is permissible.” | 5 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Riggieri | green | “independent police corroboration may make up for deficiencies in one or both of these factors.” | 3 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Lopes | green | “to establish that the transmitted information bears adequate indicia of reliability, the commonwealth must show the basis of knowledge of the source of the information (the basis of knowledge test) and the underlying circumstances demonstrating that the source of the information…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.