Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 94 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ogden v. Keystone Residence.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ogden v. Keystone Residence Anchor | green | “not be used as a means to reargue matters already argued and disposed of or as an attempt to relitigate a point of disagreement between the court and the litigant.” | 23 |
| 2 | Ogden v. Keystone Residence | green | “a motion for reconsideration is not to be used as a means to reargue matters already argued and disposed of or as an attempt to relitigate a point of disagreement between the court and the litigant.” | 15 |
| 3 | Rohrbach v. AT & T Nassau Metals Corp. | green | “patently misunderstood a party or has made a decision outside the adversarial issues presented to the court by the parties or has made an error not of reasoning but of apprehension.” | 15 |
| 4 | Database America, Inc. v. Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corp. | green | “a party seeking reconsideration must show more than a disagreement with the court's decision, and 'recapitulation of the cases and arguments considered by the court before rendering its original decision fails to carry the moving party's burden.” | 13 |
| 5 | Rohrbach v. AT & T Nassau Metals Corp. | green | “patently misunderstood a party, or has made a decision outside the adversarial issues presented to the court by the parties, or has made an error not of reasoning but of apprehension.” | 13 |
| 6 | Ogden v. Keystone Residence | green | “to reargue matters already argued and disposed of or as an attempt to relitigate a point of disagreement between the court and the litigant.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.