4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kim v. Evanston Hospital.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kim v. Evanston Hospital Anchor | green | “n opposing party will not be surprised when a treating physician testifies, because the witness was initially associated with the issues in litigation for reasons other than the sole purpose of rendering an opinion at trial.” | 4 |
| 2 | In Re JT | green | “our rules of statutory construction apply with equal force to the interpretation of all supreme court rules.” | 2 |
| 3 | In Re JT | green | “ur rules of statutory construction apply with equal force to the interpretation of all supreme court rules” | 1 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.