Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Buck Mountain Owners' Ass'n v. Prestwich.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Buck Mountain Owners' Ass'n v. Prestwich Anchor | green | “we are bound by the decisions of our state supreme court and err when we fail to follow it.” | 4 |
| 2 | State Of Washington, V. James Laron Ellis | green | “although the amendment to rcw 7.68.035 will take effect after ellis's resentencing, it applies to ellis because this case is on direct appeal.” | 4 |
| 3 | State v. Jordan | green | “given the legislature's broad purpose and the sra's loose point assignment, we have interpreted the sra as requiring rough comparability-not precision-among offenses.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.