Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lower Colorado River Authority v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lower Colorado River Authority v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co. Anchor | green | “property of counties, cities, and towns,” | 4 |
| 2 | Grand Prairie Hospital Authority v. Dallas County Appraisal District | green | “was not used exclusively for the use and benefit of the public since private doctors were leasing part of the property for their own commercial enterprises.” | 4 |
| 3 | Satterlee v. Gulf Coast Waste Disposal Authority | green | “is whether the property in question is held only for public purposes and is devoted exclusively to the use and benefit of the public,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.