Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re the Marriage of Morton.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re the Marriage of Morton Anchor | green | “we are bound by the trial court's express and implicit factual findings if they are supported by any evidence in the record.” | 5 |
| 2 | In re the Marriage of Berg | green | “the trial court's award will be upheld if, given the findings of the trial court that are supported by the record, the court's determination that an award of support is 'just and equitable' represents a choice among legally correct alternatives.” | 3 |
| 3 | In re the Marriage of Berg | green | “given the findings of the trial court that are supported by the record, the court's determination that an award of support is 'just and equitable' represents a choice among legally correct alternatives.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.