Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence Agency.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence Agency Anchor | green | “the agency must also describe 'the nature of the decisionmaking authority vested in the office or person issuing the disputed document(s), and the positions in the chain of command of the parties to the documents.” | 6 |
| 2 | Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 | green | “the 'key question' in determining whether the material is deliberative in nature 'is whether disclosure of the information would discourage candid discussion within the agency.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.