Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from O'Holleran v. O'Holleran.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O'Holleran v. O'Holleran Anchor | green | “when an appeal is initially taken to the district court from a decision by a magistrate, any subsequent review will be conducted independent of, but with due regard for, the decision of the district court.” | 5 |
| 2 | Kelly v. Kelly | green | “this court is procedurally bound to affirm or reverse the decisions of the district court.” | 3 |
| 3 | Kelly v. Kelly | green | “when a district court decides an issue in its appellate capacity, this court reviews the magistrate court's record 'to determine whether there is substantial and competent evidence to support the magistrate's findings of fact and whether the magistrate's conclusions of law follo…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.