Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Humberstone v. Wheaton.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Humberstone v. Wheaton Anchor | green | “subsequently conducted the requisite evidentiary hearing, and the record of that hearing fully supports the court's determination following the hearing” | 5 |
| 2 | Drew v. Gillin | green | “our review of the record reveals extensive findings of fact, placed on the record by family court, which demonstrate unequivocally that a significant change in circumstances occurred since the entry of the consent custody order” | 3 |
| 3 | Ward v. Ward | green | “inasmuch as the father demonstrated the necessary exigent circumstances warranting the temporary transfer” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.