Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rio Grande Community Health Center, Inc. v. Rullan.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rio Grande Community Health Center, Inc. v. Rullan Anchor | green | “not all violations of federal law give rise to 1983 actions: 'the plaintiff must assert the violation of a federal right, not merely a violation of federal law.” | 7 |
| 2 | Patricia Lynch v. Michael S. Dukakis | green | “there will be no section 1983 remedy when (1) the federal law confers no enforceable right, or (2) congress has foreclosed the 1983 remedy through the act under consideration.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.