Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mitchell-Carr v. McLendon.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mitchell-Carr v. McLendon Anchor | green | “full compliance with nmhra grievance procedures is a prerequisite to filing an nmhra claim in district court.” | 4 |
| 2 | Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Applicant-Appellee v. Superior Temporary Services, Inc. | green | “in the states that possess their own employment discrimination legislation, the eeoc must generally "defer” | 3 |
| 3 | Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Applicant-Appellee v. Superior Temporary Services, Inc. | green | “the nmhra places new mexico among those states that have their own employment discrimination legislation and contact agencies.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.