Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Byers v. Snyder.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Byers v. Snyder Anchor | green | “intentional private nuisance is a tort relating to the intentional and unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of his or her land.” | 4 |
| 2 | Herman Quarles v. Fuqua Industries, Inc. | green | “it is a general principle of corporate law . . . that a parent corporation (so-called because of control through ownership of another corporation's stock) is not liable for the acts of its subsidiaries.” | 3 |
| 3 | Heslop v. UCB, INC. | green | “the fact that one corporation is the parent of another, however, is not sufficient to warrant treating the two corporations as one without a showing that one exercises undue control over the internal affairs of the other.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.