Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 516 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. Anchor | green | “arbitration is a matter of contract and a party cannot be required to submit to arbitration any dispute which he has not agreed so to submit.” | 207 |
| 2 | United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. | green | “a party cannot be required to submit to arbitration any dispute which he has not agreed so to submit.” | 74 |
| 3 | Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U. | green | “simply requires courts to enforce privately negotiated agreements to arbitrate, like other contracts, in accordance with their terms.” | 53 |
| 4 | Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U. | green | “does not require parties to arbitrate when they have not agreed to do so.” | 52 |
| 5 | Webb v. Investacorp, Inc. | green | “whether legal constraints external to the parties' agreement foreclosed the arbitration of those claims.” | 35 |
| 6 | Ted Kubala, Jr. v. Supreme Production Svc, Inc. | green | “whether the parties entered into any arbitration agreement at all.” | 30 |
| 7 | Compucredit Corp. v. Greenwood | green | “requires courts to enforce agreements to arbitrate according to their terms.” | 24 |
| 8 | Webb v. Investacorp, Inc. | green | “apply ordinary state-law principles that govern the formation of contracts.” | 21 |
| 9 | IQ Products Company v. WD-40 Company | green | “this first step is a question of contract formation only-did the parties form a valid agreement to arbitrate some set of claims.” | 20 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.