Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Vicky Hagen Colin L. Harris v. Sisseton-Wahpeton Community College.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vicky Hagen Colin L. Harris v. Sisseton-Wahpeton Community College Anchor | green | “a tribe's sovereign immunity may extend to a tribal entity or agency” | 4 |
| 2 | Ambassador Press, Inc. v. Durst Image Technology U.S. | green | “the who, what, where, when, and how” | 3 |
| 3 | Raymond Cross v. Mark Fox | green | “a plaintiff must have suffered an injury in fact that is fairly traceable to the defendant's challenged action, and it must be likely that the injury will be redressed by a favorable judicial decision.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.