Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Ernest D. Shields.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Ernest D. Shields Anchor | green | “material to an issue at trial.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Mark Higgins, Thaddeus Harrison, and Orlando Potts | green | “even late disclosure does not constitute a brady violation unless the defendant is unable to make effective use of the evidence.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Ernest D. Shields | green | “evidence is suppressed when 'the prosecution fails to disclose the evidence in time for the defendant to make use of it' and 'the evidence was not otherwise available to the defendant through the exercise of reasonable diligence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.