Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 91 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Segal v. Rochelle.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Segal v. Rochelle Anchor | green | “sufficiently rooted in the pre-bankruptcy past” | 30 |
| 2 | Segal v. Rochelle | green | “the term 'property' has been construed most generously and an interest is not outside its reach because it is novel or contingent or because enjoyment must be postponed.” | 22 |
| 3 | Segal v. Rochelle | green | “sufficiently rooted in the pre-bankruptcy past.” | 17 |
| 4 | Krystal Cadillac-Oldsmobile Gmc Truck, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation and General Motors Acceptance Corporation | green | “is only appropriate when the inconsistent positions are tantamount to a knowing misrepresentation to or even fraud on the court.” | 7 |
| 5 | Krystal Cadillac-Oldsmobile Gmc Truck, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation and General Motors Acceptance Corporation | green | “in bad faith - i.e., with intent to play fast and loose with the court.” | 6 |
| 6 | In Re Richards | green | “in determining whether a claim is property of the bankruptcy estate, the test is not the date that the claim accrues under state law” | 5 |
| 7 | In Re Richards | green | “all of the allegedly wrongful conduct giving rise to the debtor's claim occurred prepetition,” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.