Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Connecticut Indemnity Company v. Der Travel Service, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Connecticut Indemnity Company v. Der Travel Service, Inc. Anchor | green | “it is the actual complaint, not some hypothetical version, that must be considered.” | 5 |
| 2 | Connecticut Indemnity Company v. Der Travel Service, Inc. | green | “phrases such as 'mislead and conceal,' 'scheme or device,' and 'intentionally and willfully' are the paradigm of intentional conduct and the antithesis of negligent actions.” | 3 |
| 3 | Lexmark International, Inc. v. Transportation Insurance | green | “we give little weight to the legal label that characterizes the underlying allegations. instead, we determine whether the alleged conduct arguably falls within at least one of the categories of wrongdoing listed in the policy.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.