Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Fuentes.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Fuentes Anchor | green | “intended to further gang activity but need not show what motivated” | 4 |
| 2 | People v. Dungo | green | “the degree to which the crawford rule limits an expert witness from relating case-specific hearsay content in explaining the basis for his opinion.” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Ollo | green | “personally inflicted great bodily injury on” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.