Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fowler v. City of Rexburg.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fowler v. City of Rexburg Anchor | green | “income benefits payable under the workmen's compensation law, with the exception of retraining benefits, i.c. 72-450, are based upon disability, either temporary or permanent, but not merely impairment.” | 4 |
| 2 | Fowler v. City of Rexburg | green | “while in some cases the non-medical factors will not increase the permanent disability rating over the amount of the permanent impairment rating, the ultimate award of income benefits is based upon the permanent disability rating, not merely the impairment rating.” | 4 |
| 3 | Brown v. Home Depot | green | “present and probable future ability to engage in gainful activity.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.