Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dotson v. Pfizer, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dotson v. Pfizer, Inc. Anchor | green | “while the fmla does not specifically forbid discharging an employee in retaliation for his use of fmla leave, 29 c.f.r. 825.220 (c) states that employers are 'prohibited from discriminating against employees or prospective employees who have used fmla leave' and that 'employers…” | 6 |
| 2 | Bosse v. Baltimore County | green | “merely requires proof that the employer denied the employee his entitlements under the fmla.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.