Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mayfield v. Commonwealth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mayfield v. Commonwealth Anchor | green | “when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, this court will affirm the judgment unless the judgment is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.” | 7 |
| 2 | Holcomb v. Commonwealth | green | “we 'must discard all evidence of the accused that conflicts with that of the commonwealth and regard as true all credible evidence favorable to the commonwealth and all fair inferences reasonably deducible therefrom.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.