Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Marvin v. Marvin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marvin v. Marvin Anchor | green | “adults who voluntarily live together and engage in sexual relations are nonetheless as competent as any other persons to contract respecting their earnings and property rights” | 4 |
| 2 | Hudson v. DeLonjay | green | “this case simply involves whether these parties entered into a contract for support, which is something they are legally capable of doing” | 3 |
| 3 | Boland v. Catalano | green | “property accumulated before separation should be divided by determining the express or implied intent of the parties” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.