Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Klouda v. Sixth Judicial District Department of Correctional Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Klouda v. Sixth Judicial District Department of Correctional Services Anchor | green | “powers granted by the constitution to another branch.” | 4 |
| 2 | State of Iowa v. Adam Christopher Dahl | green | “courts have the inherent power to prescribe such rules of practice . . . to facilitate the administration of justice . . . .” | 3 |
| 3 | Hammon v. Gilson | green | “courts have the inherent power to prescribe such rules of practice . . . to facilitate the administration of justice . . . .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.